Have Bounty Hunters
We are facing the last days of Roe vs. Wade. On January 22, 1973, the Supreme Court decided that women have the right to have an abortion by a 7–2 vote. Those knowledgeable believe that the court will vote 6-3 to overturn a half-century right of women to decide issues related to their reproductive rights sometime in early June.
The radical right states have passed draconian laws as they wait for the Supreme Court to override Roe vs. Wade. Some states won’t make any exceptions, even if the pregnancy was due to incest or rape.
Some states will pay bounty hunters to inform state officials about women getting abortions or doctors and others who assist the women. Donald the Dumb has been pushing the idea that women need to be punished when it comes to their deciding their reproductive healthcare even before he became president.
You and Trump are similar bedfellows if that doesn’t sound sexist, misogynist, arrogant, and denigrating women.
Now, I have an idea. Before America returns to the good old days for men and not so good old days for women, I think that we can resolve the problem. If Trump wants to punish the victim, why not also punish the guy who got the woman pregnant?
If the anti-abortion side has bounty hunters to punish the woman and those that assist her with an abortion, why not have bounty hunters provide names of men who got women pregnant and punish them? As they say, “All’s fair in love and war.”
I wrote to Justice Alito suggesting to him to include the punishment of men when the Supreme Court overturns Roe vs. Wade. In the next couple of weeks, that decision will be overturned. I am neither a medical nor judicial expert. Nonetheless, one need not by an Einstein or Hawking to understand the birds and the bees.
If Donald Dumb and his acolytes punish the pregnant woman, the person getting the woman pregnant ought to be punished also. It is the quid pro quo notion.